<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manually reconcile your bank statements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/</link>
	<description>Easy online money management</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>John,

Sorry I didn't quite understand. Can you please send us a detailed email at support [AT] buxfer [DOT] com? 

Thanks a lot! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Sorry I didn&#8217;t quite understand. Can you please send us a detailed email at support [AT] buxfer [DOT] com? </p>
<p>Thanks a lot! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P. Braniff, SR.</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>John P. Braniff, SR.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>I cannot get my bank statements to go to a web page!
Please. let know what is wrong and advise me of a correction to make!?!
(reply via e-mail)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot get my bank statements to go to a web page!<br />
Please. let know what is wrong and advise me of a correction to make!?!<br />
(reply via e-mail)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>Oh, my bad! I will add this option to the multiple selection soon. Thanks for pointing that out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, my bad! I will add this option to the multiple selection soon. Thanks for pointing that out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attilio</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Attilio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Ehm.. This ought to be my bad english... I would mean that I thought  it wasn't possible to uncheck the state because I realized that in the multiple selection wasn't.
D'you think is possible to have this feature (back to no status) in the multiple selection too ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehm.. This ought to be my bad english&#8230; I would mean that I thought  it wasn&#8217;t possible to uncheck the state because I realized that in the multiple selection wasn&#8217;t.<br />
D&#8217;you think is possible to have this feature (back to no status) in the multiple selection too ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>Attilio,

We don't want to place restrictions because sometimes users might change the status of a transaction just to play around. And more importantly, we didn't see the harm in keeping it completely free. Is there any harm in going back from 'Pending' status to the 'none' status?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attilio,</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t want to place restrictions because sometimes users might change the status of a transaction just to play around. And more importantly, we didn&#8217;t see the harm in keeping it completely free. Is there any harm in going back from &#8216;Pending&#8217; status to the &#8216;none&#8217; status?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2591</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Craig! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Craig! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attilio</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>Attilio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>This is a good feature ! Now I want to try it. First thing I suggest to put a status "none" (the default one) : now if you change a transaction status from "no status" to reconciled or pending you cannot go back without deleting the transaction and writing a new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good feature ! Now I want to try it. First thing I suggest to put a status &#8220;none&#8221; (the default one) : now if you change a transaction status from &#8220;no status&#8221; to reconciled or pending you cannot go back without deleting the transaction and writing a new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxfer.com/blog/2007/12/20/manually-reconcile-your-bank-statements/#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>Hooray, no more "Pending Transactions" account =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray, no more &#8220;Pending Transactions&#8221; account =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
